| ABOUT
THE TRIAL
The Trial, composed in 1914-15, was published posthumously
thanks only to the efforts of Kafka's literary executor, Max
Brod, who had to order the chapters as he thought the author
had intended because Kafka had left them in separate unmarked
envelopes. Nonetheless, despite this apparent imperfection,
The Trial became one of the most famous novels of the twentieth
century.
The confusion around the ordering of the chapters is reflected
in the insecurity that governs this work. The missing part
of K.'s surname alerts us to the puzzling anonymity of the
hero. Apart from his age (thirty) and the encounter with an
uncle, we know nothing of his background. He lives in a rooming
house, he works in a bank, he regularly visits a call girl-he
seems to have no close relations with anyone in his city.
What city is it anyhow? When is this taking place? And most
of all — of what and by whom does
he stand accused?
Since the word "Jew" does not appear in this book, there
is no mention ofK's religion or ethnicity, and his only appearance
in a house of worship occurs not in a synagogue but in a cathedral,
you may well ask whether the novel should be considered "Jewish"
at all. Kafka's diaries and letters are filled with reflections
about his Jewishness, but if none of these are incorporated into
his fiction, in what way can it be considered "Jewish?"
You might want to consider this after reading the novel through.
Do you think it conveys a meaningful part of the Jewish experience?
Certainly, the common use of the term "Kafkaesque" tells
us how greatly this author influenced the way people look at the
world, or else, how perfectly he registered the anxieties of a great
many others besides himself.
|
QUESTIONS
FOR ONLINE DISCUSSION
Although K. thinks clearly
and rationally, he cannot figure out why he is under arrest. Does
he ever find out, and if not, why is he ready to accompany his executioners?
How soon does the reader realize
that events in this book are not altogether subject to the laws
of realism? Or if this is all a dream, why doesn't the author say
so? Do you think this book reflects reality in spite of its fantastic
features?
How does K. go about trying
to get out of his predicament? Do you think there is any point at
which he could have refused to obey the summons ofthe court?
The legal system of modern
democracies is meant to reassure its citizens about the possibility
of justice. In what ways does the legal system in this book challenge
our normal expectations of law and justice?
What do you think about K's
relations with women? What do you think of women's relations with
him? Is any blame attached to him or to them in their unsatisfactory
interaction?
Of all those whom K. consults
about his trial, is anyone helpful? Is the priest helpful? Does
the parable of the law help K. gain any understanding of his case?
Do you have any sympathy for K.? Do you think he is guilty or
innocent? Of what?
|